|
Chinatown is one of the best detective thrillers, if not the very best, that Hollywood has ever produced. And to think that it's been made by the Hollywood outcast, Roman Polanski. The movie has Polanski written all over it, and has a haunting quality, something that I had talked about while reviewing The Ninth Gate too. Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway are at their peak here. In fact, the movie scores very high on all counts, and I feel is next only to The Godfather when it comes to cinematic perfection. I might be being unjust to a whole lot of other greats, but this movie is really good The ending is shocking and sad, and I would have preferred a happier one. I also watched Fire yesterday. I had missed it when it came out almost a decade back. Deepa Mehta has her own distinct style of film-making, which I find patchy at times, but beautiful nevertheless. A certain softness permeates her frames. And of course, it's always heartening to see Indian actors getting to do meaty roles. 1947:Earth was the better film in the trilogy, which I believe will get completed finally, despite all those controversies, as I got to know from IMDB that Water has been made as River Moon now with Lisa Ray and Seema Biswas replacing the originally planned pair of Azmi-Das. Coming back to Fire, it is a 'bold' film, and still keeps from turning into the obscene and cheap skin-shows that today's 'bold' Hindi films are. When you have actors of the calibre of Kulbhushan Kharbanda, Shabana Azmi and Nandita Das, competent performances are naturally expected and, thankfully, delivered. Azmi's facial expressions to show sadness (and sexual deprivation) are perfect. The story, or rather the situations are funny at times, especially the antics of Mundu (played by Ranjit Chowdhury, who always seems to get weird roles), which despite being really shocking (you have got to see the movie to understand what I mean) only made me smile. The use of English in decidedly Indian situations also adds to the comic aspect, but probably unintentionally. And finally, I reread Jonathan Livingston Seagull after a gap of five years yesterday. I had almost forgotten how beautiful, yet simple, the book is. |
| aditya October 31, 2007 05:20 PM PDT I really liked ur post, thanks for sharing. Keep writing. I discovered a good site for bloggers check out this www.blogadda.com, you can submit your blog there, you can get more auidence. | ||
| wanderer April 27, 2005 09:09 PM PDT congrats for getting through IIM-A | ||
| Twilight Fairy April 26, 2005 09:26 PM PDT Any scope of seeing u at DBM VI? | ||
| Ajay April 14, 2005 12:10 AM PDT ur right..the background score is as important to a well-made film as the script or the acting is..its like another character of the plot. sadly, our focus has been more on the 'foreground' score only..tho some of the thrillers of the 60s here did have some impressive scores. Did u attend the Chinese Premier's lecture? was there much point in what he said, or was it the usual blah(as it seems from the papers? | ||
| envisager April 13, 2005 06:14 PM PDT Well..even i liked 1947 Earth a lot, and yeah you are right, it is rare to see Indian actors get meaty roles...but interestingly they do manage to come up with brilliant performances most of the time, esp the veterans.... that emans they are good, all they need are more chances... | ||
| The Observer April 10, 2005 12:11 AM PDT well i somehow dint like chinatown... though of course yojimbo was goood (i think ive mentioned that earlier)...talking of hitchcock, dunno if u have seen rear window, but after watching movies like vertigo and rope, this one was a letdown...i dunno, maybe its me.. each one to his own | ||
| Leave a Comment: |